grant

The FRESH Study: The Fresh Bucks racial equity, socioeconomic & health outcomes study

Organization UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONLocation SEATTLE, UNITED STATESPosted 1 Sept 2023Deadline 31 May 2027
NIHUS FederalResearch GrantFY2025AddressAffectAmericanBMIBMI percentileBMI z-scoreBlackBlack PopulationsBlack groupBlack individualBlack peopleBlack raceBlacksBlood PressureBody mass indexCardiometabolic DiseaseCardiometabolic DisorderCessation of lifeConsumptionDataDeathDietDietary qualityDisparitiesDisparityEatingEconomic FactorsEconomic IncomeEconomical FactorsEconomical IncomeEconomicsElectronic Health RecordEligibilityEligibility DeterminationEmploymentEnrollmentEquityEthnic OriginEthnicityExclusionFamily memberFederal GovernmentFeelingFoodFood IntakeHealthHealth FoodHealth InequityHealth PromotionHealthy EatingHigh-Income PopulationsHourHouseholdImmigrantImpact evaluationImpoverishedIncentivesIncomeIndividuals from minorityIndividuals of minorityInequalities in HealthInequities in HealthInequityIntakeInterventionLanguageLatineLatinxLatinx groupLatinx individualLatinx peopleLatinx populationLow Income PopulationLow incomeLow income groupMarketingMethodologyMethodsMinority GroupsMinority PeopleMinority PopulationMinority individualMunicipalitiesNational GovernmentNeighborhoodsNutritious foodOutcomeOutcome StudyParticipantPersonsPlayPoliciesPolicy MakerPopulationPovertyPriceProtocol ScreeningQualifyingQuasi-experimentQuasi-experimental analysisQuasi-experimental approachQuasi-experimental designQuasi-experimental methodsQuasi-experimental researchQuasi-experimental studyQuasi-experimental techniqueQuetelet indexRaceRacesRacial EquityRandomizedRisk FactorsSalutogenesisSample SizeServicesSourceSpatial DistributionStructural RacismSupermarketWaiting ListsWorkaccess disparitiesaccessibility disparitiesbeneficiarycardiometaboliccardiometabolic riskcardiometabolismcardiovascular riskcardiovascular risk factorcohortcommunity partnerscommunity-based partnerscomparator groupcomparison groupcostdesigndesigningdiet qualitydietarydietsdisparities in accesseconomicelectronic health care recordelectronic health medical recordelectronic health plan recordelectronic health registryelectronic medical health recordenrollexperiencefarmers marketsfeelingsfinancial incentivefinancial rewardfood insecurityfood securityfruits and vegetablesgroup of colorhealth inequalitieshealth recordhealthy foodhigh income grouphigh income individualhigh income peoplehigh riskimprovedincentive programincentive-based programincomesindividual of colorinequality in accessinequity in accessinequity in accessibilityinnovateinnovationinnovativelow income individuallow income peoplemonetary incentivemortalityoperationoperationspeople of colorperson of colorpopulation of colorpricingprogramspromoting healthracialracial backgroundracial identityracial originrandomisationrandomizationrandomly assignedsocio-economicsocio-economicallysocioeconomicallysocioeconomicsstructural determinantsstructural factorssystemic barriersystemic hurdlesystemic obstacleusabilitywaitlist
Sign up free to applyApply link · pipeline · email alerts
— or —

Get email alerts for similar roles

Weekly digest · no password needed · unsubscribe any time

Full Description

ABSTRACT. Stark disparities in cardiometabolic health outcomes exist by racialized identity and income level.
Low-income populations experience 40-70% higher risk for cardiovascular mortality compared to higher-income

populations. Black and Latinx populations experience higher rates of at-risk cardiovascular profiles compared to

White populations. Diet quality is hypothesized to play a key role in these disparities. But consuming a health-

promoting diet is out of reach for many Americans, and disproportionately so for low-income populations and

people of color. Structural and economic factors make high-quality diets out of reach for many. Specifically, the

intersecting experience of food insecurity, poverty, structural racism, precarious employment, high cost, and

difficult to access healthier foods creates a discriminatory and unjust context where accessing, purchasing, and

eating a health-promoting diet, particularly one high in fruits and vegetables, is unattainable. As a result,

interventions and policies that reduce these structural and economic barriers have high potential to improve food

security, dietary quality, and ultimately improve health. To this end, the federal government, several states, and

municipalities have introduced policy interventions that provide financial incentives to promote the purchase of

fruits and vegetables by low-income populations. However, several prominent design features of these programs

leave many of the structural causes of food insecurity and low fruit and vegetable consumption in place. In this

study, we can improve what is known about the equity and impact of fruit and vegetable incentive programs

through the study of Seattle's Fresh Bucks Program. This program has been designed with several features that

have the potential to overcome the limitations of previous programs. Methodologically, we propose a mixed

methods study that leverages randomized assignment for assessing causal impact, includes participatory

approaches and a sequential explanatory mixed methods design to assess equity in implementation, and a

quasi-experimental design to utilize electronic health records of program participants and a matched comparison

population to estimate associations with long-term (2-4 years) program enrollment and health outcomes in the

following Aims: 1) Determine the impact of Fresh Bucks on fruit and vegetable intake and food insecurity,

leveraging randomized program assignment for causal impacts. 2) Assess Fresh Bucks implementation equity

through redemption rates and experience. 3) Assess the impact of long-term access to Fresh Bucks on

cardiometabolic health, including blood pressure and BMI, in a cohort of recipients and family members with

matched electronic health records. Decreasing food insecurity and improving diet quality among low-income and

minoritized populations is of primary importance for policymakers concerned about reducing systemic barriers

to health. Upon completion of this work, we will have substantially advanced what is known about the dietary,

health and implementation equity impacts of fruit and vegetable incentive programs and the potential for these

policies to reduce systemic barriers to health.

Grant Number: 5R01HL168190-03
NIH Institute/Center: NIH

Principal Investigator: Barbara Baquero

Sign up free to get the apply link, save to pipeline, and set email alerts.

Sign up free →

Agency Plan

7-day free trial

Unlock procurement & grants

Upgrade to access active tenders from World Bank, UNDP, ADB and more — with email alerts and pipeline tracking.

$29.99 / month

  • 🔔Email alerts for new matching tenders
  • 🗂️Track tenders in your pipeline
  • 💰Filter by contract value
  • 📥Export results to CSV
  • 📌Save searches with one click
Start 7-day free trial →