grant

Improving the Timeliness and Quality of Care for Rural Lung and Head-and-Neck Cancer Patients

Organization UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVERLocation Aurora, UNITED STATESPosted 1 Jul 2021Deadline 30 Jun 2027
NIHUS FederalResearch GrantFY2025Access to CareAdoptionAffectAnxietyAppointmentAssess implementationBehavioral ModelBreast Cancer PatientBreast Tumor PatientCancer AdvocacyCancer PatientCancer TreatmentCancersCaringCase ManagementCharitiesClinical TrialsClinical Trials DesignClinics and HospitalsClinics or HospitalsCollaborationsColoradoCommunicationDecrease disparityDiagnosisDiseaseDisorderDisparitiesDisparityDissemination and ImplementationDistressEconomic IncomeEconomical IncomeEffectiveness of InterventionsEnabling FactorsEthnic OriginEthnicityEvidence based interventionFaceGoalsHNC patientHead and Neck CancerHead and Neck CarcinomaHealth Care SystemsHealth Services AccessibilityHealth systemHospitalsImplementation assessmentIncomeIndividualInsuranceInsurance CoverageInsurance StatusInterventionIntervention StrategiesLiteratureLow incomeLower disparityLungLung Respiratory SystemMalignant Head and Neck NeoplasmMalignant Neoplasm TherapyMalignant Neoplasm TreatmentMalignant NeoplasmsMalignant TumorMalignant Tumor of the LungMalignant neoplasm of lungMeasuresMedical OncologyMental DepressionModelingMontanaMorbidityMorbidity - disease rateOperative ProceduresOperative Surgical ProceduresOutcomeOutcome StudyPatient Outcomes AssessmentsPatient Reported MeasuresPatient Reported OutcomesPatient outcomePatient-Centered OutcomesPatient-Focused OutcomesPatientsPredisposing FactorPulmonary CancerPulmonary malignant NeoplasmQOCQOLQuality of CareQuality of lifeRaceRacesRadiation OncologyRandomizedRandomized Controlled Clinical TrialsRandomized, Controlled TrialsRecurrent Malignant NeoplasmRecurrent Malignant TumorRecurrent diseaseRelapsed DiseaseReportingRuralSisterStressSubgroupSurgicalSurgical InterventionsSurgical ProcedureSurvey InstrumentSurveysThe University of Colorado Cancer CenterTimeTobacco ConsumptionTobacco useTravelTreatment outcomeUnderinsuredUnderserved PopulationUninsuredUniversitiesUtahVulnerable PopulationsWorkWyomingaccess to health servicesaccess to servicesaccess to treatmentaccessibility to health servicesanti-cancer therapyassess effectivenessavailability of servicescancer diagnosiscancer disparitycancer health disparitycancer recurrencecancer therapycancer-directed therapycancer-related health disparitycare accesscare as usualcare coordinationcare outcomescare providerscare servicescare systemsclinical practiceclinical significanceclinically significantco-morbidco-morbiditycomorbiditycoordinating carecopingcost effectivecost effectivenessdepressiondetermine effectivenessdisparity in cancerdisparity reductioneducation resourceseducational resourceseffectiveness assessmenteffectiveness evaluationevaluate effectivenessevaluate implementationevaluation of implementationexamine effectivenessexperiencefacesfacialfinancial toxicityfrontier countieshead and neck cancer patienthead/neck cancerhealth and care deliveryhealth care deliveryhealth care outcomeshealth delivery systemshealth service accesshealth services availabilityhealth services deliveryimplementation evaluationimprovedincomesindividuals with breast cancerintervention deliveryintervention effectlow SESlow socio-economic positionlow socio-economic statuslow socioeconomic positionlow socioeconomic statuslung cancermalignancymalignant head and neck tumormitigate disparitymortalityneoplasm/cancerpatient navigationpatient oriented outcomespatients with breast cancerperceived stressperception of stressperson with breast cancerpractical implementationpragmatic implementationprimary outcomeracialracial backgroundracial originrandomisationrandomizationrandomized control clinical trialrandomized control trialrandomly assignedrecruitreduce disparityreduction in disparityrural arearural countiesrural locationrural patientsrural regionrural under servedrural underservedscale upsecondary outcomeself-reported stressservice availabilitysexside effectstress perceptionsurgerytobacco product usetreatment accesstreatment as usualtreatment sitetrial designtumorunder served groupunder served individualunder served peopleunder served populationunderserved groupunderserved individualunderserved peopleusual carevulnerable groupvulnerable individualvulnerable people
Sign up free to applyApply link · pipeline · email alerts
— or —

Get email alerts for similar roles

Weekly digest · no password needed · unsubscribe any time

Full Description

ABSTRACT:
Improving the timeliness and quality of care for lung cancer (LC) and head and neck cancer (HNC) patients is of

utmost importance because delays in treatment initiation are associated with cancer recurrence, lower survival,

and poor patient outcomes (e.g., distress). Rural LC and HNC patients experience significant treatment delays.

Compared to urban patients, patients in rural areas face added challenges such as needing to travel long

distances to access care, having lower socio-economic status, and having less availability of cancer treatment.

The objective of this study is to improve the timeliness and quality of care for LC and HNC patients who are

underserved (e.g., low-income, underinsured) and from rural and frontier counties in the Rocky Mountain States,

treated by the University of Colorado Health System that serves patients from Colorado and Wyoming and the

Sisters of Charity of Leavenworth Health System that serves rural patients from Colorado, Utah, and Montana.

We will apply the CARES (Cancer Advocacy, Resources Education, and Support) intervention to target factors

specific to rural LC and HNC patients who are underserved and factors that due to their statistical and clinical

significance are associated with suboptimal initiation of treatment and poor quality of care for these patients. The

hallmark of the CARES intervention is implementing it at key points during LC and HNC treatment, likely

augmenting its effects on the outcomes more effectively and more efficiently than current usual care practices.

Using a randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) design, we will compare the CARES intervention effects to the

effects of usual care practice on the: (a) time to treatment initiation and (b) time to treatment completion. The

CARES intervention also targets (c) quality of care outcomes (e.g., patient communication, coordination of care,

providing information to patients) and (d) patient-reported outcomes (e.g., coping, distress, quality of life).

Approximately 440 LC and HNC patients will be recruited and randomly assigned to either the intervention

(n=220) or to the usual care condition (n=220). We will employ intent-to-treat analyses with linear mixed models

(LMMs) to analyze the primary outcome of time to treatment initiation and the secondary outcomes. We predict

that those who receive the CARES intervention will improve in all study outcomes to a greater degree than those

who received usual care. Our ultimate goal is the dissemination and implementation of the CARES intervention

into rural clinical practice to improve the timeliness and quality of care for rural and underserved patients and

reduce disparities in LC and HNC morbidity and mortality. Thus, we will assess the pragmatic implementation

and scalability of the CARES intervention by evaluating the overall effectiveness of the intervention's strategies,

as well as "how and why" they work in real-world practice.

Grant Number: 5R01CA254730-04
NIH Institute/Center: NIH

Principal Investigator: Evelinn Borrayo

Sign up free to get the apply link, save to pipeline, and set email alerts.

Sign up free →

Agency Plan

7-day free trial

Unlock procurement & grants

Upgrade to access active tenders from World Bank, UNDP, ADB and more — with email alerts and pipeline tracking.

$29.99 / month

  • 🔔Email alerts for new matching tenders
  • 🗂️Track tenders in your pipeline
  • 💰Filter by contract value
  • 📥Export results to CSV
  • 📌Save searches with one click
Start 7-day free trial →