grant

Development of a patient-provider decision aid for HIV post-exposure prophylaxis

Organization UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCISLocation LITTLE ROCK, UNITED STATESPosted 1 Jul 2022Deadline 30 Jun 2026
NIHUS FederalResearch GrantFY2024AIDSAIDS VirusAccountabilityAcquired Immune DeficiencyAcquired Immune Deficiency SyndromeAcquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome VirusAcquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeAcquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome VirusActive Follow-upAcuteAdherenceAdoptedAgeAnti-HIV PositivityAnti-Retroviral AgentsAreaCaringCenters for Disease ControlCenters for Disease Control and PreventionCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.)ClinicalCommunitiesComplexConflictConflict (Psychology)ConfusionConfusional StateCost SavingsD.C. WashingtonDC WashingtonDataDecision AidDecision MakingDevelopmentDistrict of ColumbiaDrugsEducationEducational aspectsEffectivenessEmotionalEpidemicEquityExposure toFeedbackFinancial HardshipForensic MedicineForensicsFutureGoalsGroups at riskHIVHIV PositiveHIV PositivityHIV SeroconversionHIV SeropositivityHIV antibody positiveHIV riskHTLV-III SeroconversionHTLV-III SeropositivityHealth Care ProvidersHealth PersonnelHealth behaviorHealthcare ProvidersHealthcare workerHigh-Risk SexHourHuman Immunodeficiency VirusesInequityInternationalInterventionIntervention StrategiesJusticeKnowledgeLAV-HTLV-IIILymphadenopathy-Associated VirusMeasuresMedicalMedicationMental ConfusionMethodsMultimediaMultimediumNursesOutcomeOutputPatient CarePatient Care DeliveryPatientsPatternPeople at riskPerceptionPersonal SatisfactionPersonsPersons at riskPharmaceutical PreparationsPopulations at RiskPrevention GuidelinesPrivacyProcessProphylactic treatmentProphylaxisProviderQualifyingRaceRacesRecommendationRegimenRelationship-BuildingReportingRiskScienceSocial supportSourceStandardizationSurvey InstrumentSurveysTechnologyTestingTranslatingTransmissionUnited States Centers for Disease ControlUnited States Centers for Disease Control and PreventionUnprotected SexUnsafe SexVariantVariationViralVirus-HIVWorkWorld Health Organizationacceptability and feasibilityactive followupagesanti-retroviralassaulted sexuallycare for patientscare of patientscaring for patientscase-by-case basisclinical practiceclinician behaviorclinician communicationcognitive interviewcommunicate to clinicianscommunicate to providerscommunicate with clinicianscommunicate with doctorscommunicate with providerscommunity advisory boardcommunity advisory committeecommunity advisory panelcondomless intercoursecondomless sexcostcost effectivenesscost estimatecost estimationdesigndesigningdevelop therapydevelopmentaldigitaldoctor communicationdrug/agentefficacy testingevidence baseexperiencefinancial adversityfinancial burdenfinancial distressfinancial insecurityfinancial strainfinancial stressfollow upfollow-upfollowed upfollowuphealth care personnelhealth care workerhealth providerhealth related behaviorhealth workforcehealthcare personnelhigh riskimprovedinternet based deliveryinternet deliveredinternet deliveryintervention developmentinterventional strategyintravenous drug uselife time costlifetime costmarginalizationmarginalized groupmarginalized individualmarginalized peoplemarginalized populationmedical personnelnurseparticipant engagementpatient engagementpatient-clinician communicationpatient-doctor communicationpatient-provider communicationperpetratorsphysician behaviorpillpreventpreventingprogramsprototypeprovider behaviorprovider communicationracialracial backgroundracial originresponserisk perceptionrisk sharingseroconversionsexual assaultsexual attackside effectsocial stigmasocial support networkstigmatheoriestherapy developmenttooltransmission processtreatment developmenttreatment providerunprotected intercoursewell-beingwellbeing
Sign up free to applyApply link · pipeline · email alerts
— or —

Get email alerts for similar roles

Weekly digest · no password needed · unsubscribe any time

Full Description

PROJECT SUMMARY
While many questions remain regarding specific rates for HIV PEP preventable transmissions related to the

real world challenges of HIV seroconversion and measuring risk, we do know that: 1) among people who

experience a known exposure, HIV PEP is effective and potentially cost saving if initiated in a timely manner

and completed fully; 2) patients who have been offered, accepted, and even completed HIV PEP continue to

report confusion and inaccurate information regarding its use; and 3) in many contexts decision aids have been

demonstrated to improve patient reported knowledge regarding decision making, decrease decisional conflict,

and improve patient-provider communication. Given these gaps, the long-term goal of this work is to develop,

refine, and validate a technology-delivered decision aid to assist providers in better understanding and

effectively implementing HIV PEP in practice, and assist patients to better understand the decision they are

making when provided with HIV PEP as an option so that they may more successfully 1) make the decision,

and 2) complete the entire 28-day course of medication when they decide to initiate HIV PEP.

The proposed decision aid leverages a known clinical opportunity to engage patients who are at risk for

seroconversion in initiation of HIV PEP. By creating an internet-delivered multimedia tool that: 1) removes

provider biases regarding what qualifies as an HIV risk from the discussion process; 2) slows the process of

information sharing and decision making down and presents information in short, repeatable pieces; and 3)

incorporates an opportunity for patients to reflect on key aspects that have been shown to impact decision

making and adherence (e.g. social support/stigma, HIV risk perception, cost/access, side effects) prior to

making the decision we anticipate that patients will have less decisional conflict, feel more confident about their

decision, and for patients who initiate HIV PEP, be more able to complete the entire regimen.

Lastly, the proposal includes relationship building via a community advisory board to support all steps of

decision aid development and subsequent testing. Principles of design justice (e.g. adopting co-design

methods, developing specific mechanisms for accountability, centering the needs of marginalized users) will be

used to partner with this group of patient and health care providers to design specific aspects of intervention

content, and plan details of the future efficacy testing study.

Grant Number: 5R34MH129217-03
NIH Institute/Center: NIH

Principal Investigator: Jocelyn Anderson

Sign up free to get the apply link, save to pipeline, and set email alerts.

Sign up free →

Agency Plan

7-day free trial

Unlock procurement & grants

Upgrade to access active tenders from World Bank, UNDP, ADB and more — with email alerts and pipeline tracking.

$29.99 / month

  • 🔔Email alerts for new matching tenders
  • 🗂️Track tenders in your pipeline
  • 💰Filter by contract value
  • 📥Export results to CSV
  • 📌Save searches with one click
Start 7-day free trial →