grant

Determining the performance and accuracy of SILVAMP TB LAM and cost-effectiveness of diagnostic testing for TB meningitis

Organization UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTALocation MINNEAPOLIS, UNITED STATESPosted 21 Jun 2022Deadline 31 May 2027
NIHUS FederalResearch GrantFY2025AIDS VirusAccuracy of DiagnosisAcid FastAcid Fast BacillaeAcid Fast Bacillae Staining MethodAcquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome VirusAcquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome VirusAddressAfrica South of the SaharaAreaAssayAutopsyBacillusBioassayBiological AssayCause of DeathCerebrospinal FluidCessation of lifeCost effectiveness researchCost-Benefit AnalysisDataDeathDeath RateDiagnosisDiagnosticDiagnostic testsEngineeringFunctional MetagenomicsGuidelinesHIVHealthHospital CostsHospitalization costHourHuman Immunodeficiency VirusesIncidenceInfrastructureInternationalInvestmentsJapanLAV-HTLV-IIILymphadenopathy-Associated VirusM tuberculosis infectionM. tb infectionM. tuberculosis infectionM.tb infectionM.tuberculosis infectionMTB infectionMeningeal TBMeningeal TuberculosisMeningitisMetagenomicsMorbidityMorbidity - disease rateMycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) infectionMycobacterium tuberculosis infectionNGS MethodNGS systemNeurological disabilityOutcomePatientsPerformancePersonsPilot ProjectsPredictive ValueProbabilityProspective cohortReference StandardsResearchResearch ResourcesResourcesSamplingSpecificitySpeedSub-Saharan AfricaSubsaharan AfricaSurvivorsTB diagnosticsTB infectionTB meningitisTechniquesTechnologyTestingTokyoTuberculosisTuberculosis MeningitisTuberculous MeningitisVirus-HIVantigen based testantigen testassessing cost effectivenesscerebral spinal fluidclinical decision-makingclinical practicecohortcostcost benefit economicscost benefit effectivenesscost effectivecost effectivenesscost-effectiveness evaluationdetermine cost effectivenessdiagnostic abilitydiagnostic accuracydiagnostic approachdiagnostic capabilitydiagnostic powerdiagnostic strategydiagnostic tooldiagnostic utilitydiagnostic valuedisseminated TBdisseminated tuberculosiseffectiveness testingevaluate cost-effectivenessexamine cost effectivenessimprovedimproved outcomeinfection due to Mycobacterium tuberculosisinstrumentlipoarabinomannanmortalitymortality ratemortality ratiomycobacterialnecropsynext gen sequencingnext generation sequencingnextgen sequencingnovelperformance testspilot studypoint of carepostmortemrapid assayrapid testrapid testsrural localityrural placerural settingspinal fluidstandard of carestudy populationtuberculosis diagnosticstuberculosis infectiontuberculous spondyloarthropathy
Sign up free to applyApply link · pipeline · email alerts
— or —

Get email alerts for similar roles

Weekly digest · no password needed · unsubscribe any time

Full Description

Project Summary
Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is the second most common cause of meningitis in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Neurologic disability and mortality are common, mortality is at least 50% in people with HIV. TBM diagnosis

remains difficult and diagnostic delay/missed diagnosis are major contributors to poor outcomes. Acid fast

bacilli smear of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is cheap and fast but with sensitivity of only ~10% in most settings.

CSF culture has improved sensitivity (~50-60%) but is slow, up to six weeks. Our studies on GeneXpert

MTB/Rif and the re-engineered GeneXpert MTB/Rif Ultra showed improved sensitivity (50-80%) with these

rapid (~2hrs) tests. Yet, these tests have inadequate negative predictive value to rule-out TBM, require

expensive instruments and cartridges, and their availability is inconsistent across the areas with the highest TB

incidence. Thus, alternative or additional tests for TBM remain crucial needs to improve outcomes.

A previous lipoarabinomannan (LAM) antigen test (Alere) had only ~20% sensitivity in CSF. Our study of

the SILVAMP TB LAM (FujiLAM) assay in CSF found 52% sensitivity in definite or probable TBM compared to

55% for Xpert Ultra yet this study was small and requires confirmation. Of the 58 cases of definite or probable

TBM, six were positive by FujiLAM but not Xpert Ultra. Eight were positive by Xpert Ultra but not FujiLAM. This

study was unable to systematically and thoroughly address cases that were possibly false by FujiLAM. Further,

formal cost-benefit analysis for this test, and other important tests for TBM has not been done. Given that cost

remains a major limitation in accessing TB diagnostic tests, the lack of research in this area is problematic.

Our overall objective is to reduce mortality and morbidity due to TBM by improving diagnostic accuracy,

rapidity, and cost-effectiveness. To accomplish these objectives, the aims of this proposal are to: 1) Determine

the accuracy of SILVAMP TB LAM (FujiLAM) in CSF to diagnose TBM in comparison to uniform TBM case

definitions; 2) Determine whether positive SILVAMP TB LAM (FujiLAM) tests without corroboration by other

TBM tests are false or true positives, using autopsy and metagenomics next generation sequencing; and 3)

Determine the cost and cost-effectiveness of TBM diagnostic testing strategies, including FujiLAM and

GeneXpert MTB/Rif Ultra.

The first two aims focus on better defining the diagnostic accuracy of FujiLAM, an easy to use, rapid test,

that requires limited technological infrastructure or expertise. The third aim focuses on cost-effectiveness of

this test and other commonly used tests. These studies will impact clinical practice by better informing our

understanding of the diagnostic tools for TBM. This proposal has the potential to shift the paradigm of TBM

diagnosis to two rapid tests, FujiLAM and Xpert Ultra, influencing international WHO guidelines while providing

valuable costing data for stake holders and ministries of health to consider investment and implementation.

Grant Number: 3R01AI170158-05S1
NIH Institute/Center: NIH

Principal Investigator: Nathan Bahr

Sign up free to get the apply link, save to pipeline, and set email alerts.

Sign up free →

Agency Plan

7-day free trial

Unlock procurement & grants

Upgrade to access active tenders from World Bank, UNDP, ADB and more — with email alerts and pipeline tracking.

$29.99 / month

  • 🔔Email alerts for new matching tenders
  • 🗂️Track tenders in your pipeline
  • 💰Filter by contract value
  • 📥Export results to CSV
  • 📌Save searches with one click
Start 7-day free trial →