grant

CE24-012 - ASSESSING THE IMPLEMENTATION AND OUTCOMES OF STATE PRENATAL DRUG USE LAWS

Organization JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYLocation BALTIMORE, UNITED STATESPosted 30 Sept 2024Deadline 29 Sept 2027
ALLCDCNIHUS FederalResearch GrantFY2025
Sign up free to applyApply link · pipeline · email alerts
— or —

Get email alerts for similar roles

Weekly digest · no password needed · unsubscribe any time

Full Description

Prenatal drug use has increased nearly five-fold over the past two decades and is associated with elevated risk
of drug overdose, maternal morbidity and mortality, adverse birth outcomes, and family separation through

foster care. States have enacted several types of laws in response to the rising rates of prenatal drug use: 1)

child maltreatment laws deeming prenatal drug use child maltreatment; 2) mandatory reporting laws requiring

providers to report prenatal drug use to child protective services; 3) testing laws mandating that providers drug

test pregnant patients or newborns, and/or giving providers legal protection to drug test pregnant patients

without consent; 4) criminalization laws criminalizing prenatal drug use; and 5) priority access laws giving

pregnant people priority access to drug treatment. Evidence on these laws’ effects on overdose, treatment

engagement and health care use among pregnant and postpartum people and their infants is limited. Critically,

evidence on whether and how the effects of these laws differ by race or ethnicity are also lacking. Meanwhile,

in 2018, Congress passed the Family First Prevention Services Act (FFPSA), dramatically overhauling state

child welfare system financing. FFPSA newly allows the use of federal funds to provide services to parents at

risk of losing custody of their children, including paying for SUD treatment services. All five types of prenatal

drug laws involve the child welfare system, but no research to date has examined how implementation of

FFPSA-driven changes to the child welfare system may vary across states with different prenatal drug law

contexts. We fill these critical research gaps through the proposed mixed-method, concurrent-embedded study

using an innovative adaptation of difference-in-differences methods. We will examine the effects of state

prenatal drug use laws on drug screening and substance use disorder diagnosis (Aim 1) and health care use

and nonfatal overdose (Aim 2). We will examine 16 state policy changes during the study period and estimate

racial disparities in policy impact using 50-state administrative Medicaid claims for 2015-2022. We will integrate

findings from Aims 1 and 2 with a qualitative analysis characterizing how states have implemented FFPSA

across heterogeneous prenatal drug law contexts (Aim 3). The proposed study is the first to use 50 state

Medicaid data and robust causal inference methods to evaluate state laws’ effects on substance use-related

outcomes (Aims 1 & 2) and to conduct a novel exploration of a new federal law, FFPSA, which has far-

reaching implications for state child welfare systems’ interaction with parents with substance use. Findings will

inform other researchers, health system leaders, and policymakers dedicated to improving the health and well-

being of families affected by substance use.

Grant Number: 5R01CE003689-02
NIH Institute/Center: ALLCDC

Principal Investigator: Sachini Bandara

Sign up free to get the apply link, save to pipeline, and set email alerts.

Sign up free →

Agency Plan

7-day free trial

Unlock procurement & grants

Upgrade to access active tenders from World Bank, UNDP, ADB and more — with email alerts and pipeline tracking.

$29.99 / month

  • 🔔Email alerts for new matching tenders
  • 🗂️Track tenders in your pipeline
  • 💰Filter by contract value
  • 📥Export results to CSV
  • 📌Save searches with one click
Start 7-day free trial →