grant

Beyond the Medical: The ELSI of Polygenic Scores for Social Traits

Organization UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILLLocation CHAPEL HILL, UNITED STATESPosted 13 Jun 2022Deadline 31 Mar 2027
NIHUS FederalResearch GrantFY2025AddressAdmissionAdmission activityAttitudeAwarenessBehaviorBehavioralBenefits and RisksBiologicalCardiac DiseasesCardiac DisordersCase StudyCognitive DiscriminationCommentCommentaryComplexConsentConsumptionDataData BasesDatabasesDevelopmentDiabetes MellitusDiscriminationDiseaseDisorderDisparitiesDisparityELSIEarly DiagnosisEconomic IncomeEconomical IncomeEditorial CommentEducationEducational aspectsEmpirical ResearchEnvironmentEnvironmental FactorEnvironmental Risk FactorEthicsEugenicsGene variantGenesGeneticGenomicsGoalsHealthHeart DiseasesHuntington ChoreaHuntington DiseaseHuntington'sHuntington's DiseaseHuntingtons DiseaseIncomeIndividualInequityInsurance CarriersInsurersInterviewInvestigatorsLawsLegalLifeMapsMeasuresMedicalMethodologyModelingOutcomePaperParticipantPerceptionPoliciesPolicy AnalysesPolicy AnalysisPolicy MakerPolygenic CharactersPolygenic InheritancesPolygenic TraitsPopulationPredicting RiskPredictive ValueProcessPublic HealthPublicationsPublished CommentRegulationReproductive BehaviorResearchResearch DesignResearch PersonnelResearch ResourcesResearchersResourcesRiskRisk BehaviorsRisky BehaviorRoleScanningScientific PublicationScientistSexualitySocial ImpactsSocial JusticeSocial PoliciesSocial SciencesSocial outcomeSourceStudentsStudy TypeSurvey InstrumentSurveysTechnologyTestingUniversitiesViewpointallelic variantat risk behaviorbarriers to implementationbehavior outcomebehavioral outcomebiobankbiologicbiorepositorycase reportconferenceconventiondata basedevelopmentaldiabetesearly detectionenvironmental riskethicalethical legal and socialethical, legal, and social implicationforecasting riskgene testinggene-based testinggenetic predictorsgenetic technologygenetic testinggenetic variantgenomic variantheart disorderhigh riskimplementation barriersimplementation challengesimprovedincomeslegal casesnew technologynewsnovel technologiesoptimismpersonalization of treatmentpersonalized medicinepersonalized therapypersonalized treatmentpolicy evaluationpolygenetic risk scorespolygenic predictorspolygenic risk scorepolygenic scorespositive attitudepredict riskpredict riskspredicted riskpredicted riskspredicting riskspredictive riskpredicts riskresearch studyrisk predictionrisk predictionssocialsocial disadvantagesocial disparitiessocial genomicssocial inequalitysocial interventionssocial rolesocial science researchsocio-genomicssociogenomicsstakeholder insightsstakeholder perspectivesstudy designsummitsymposiasymposiumtraittrend
Sign up free to applyApply link · pipeline · email alerts
— or —

Get email alerts for similar roles

Weekly digest · no password needed · unsubscribe any time

Full Description

7. PROJECT SUMMARY/ ABSTRACT
In traditional predictive genetic testing single gene variants are analyzed to determine whether an individual is

at high risk of developing a disease. The vast majority of diseases, however, are polygenic—caused by many

different genes. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) have been heralded for their promise to predict risk for these more

complex diseases like heart disease or diabetes by measuring the contribution of hundreds or thousands of

genetic variants at once. Yet beyond prediction of health or medical outcomes, the realm of `sociogenomics' is

developing polygenic scores (PGS) measuring genetic contributions to social traits and behavioral factors, such

as income, educational attainment, sexuality, and optimism. Proponents of sociogenomic PGS cite the

potential for this research to increase understanding of the interplay between genetic and environmental

factors, to account for genetic factors in social science research, and to create personalized social interventions

akin to personalized medicine. But others worry that sociogenomic PGS findings could lead to discrimination

and an exacerbation of existing social disparities. In order to understand the ethical, legal, and social

implications of sociogenomic PGS research and its outcomes, this project addresses the following research

questions: 1) What are the current trends in the development of sociogenomic PGS and what are the possible

applications of scores in social settings?; 2) How do various stakeholders perceive the benefits and risks of

sociogenomic PGS?; and 3) How well do existing laws, policies, or governance protect against the potential

harms of sociogenomic PGS while also promoting their potential benefits? Answering these questions requires

both empirical research and legal analysis. Using horizon scanning methodologies, Aim 1 maps the landscape

of sociogenomic PGS, their potential applications, and how sociogenomic research findings are presented to

and consumed by the public. Aim 2 enlists those involved in the pipeline of sociogenomics research (biobank

participants whose genetic data may be used to develop PGS, PGS researchers who develop the scores, and

social scientists who may use the scores in their research studies) to examine and assess their attitudes toward

the range of harms and benefits of sociogenomic PGS, and the implications of varying applications of PGS.

Both of these efforts will inform Aim 3, which consists of a legal and policy analysis of how current legal rules

protect against potential misuse and/or promote possible benefits of sociogenomic findings. The product of

this project will be a set of case studies designed to help policy makers and researchers anticipate and mitigate

the potential harms of employing sociogenomic PGS in various social settings while still identifying and

maximizing potential benefits.

Grant Number: 5R01HG012402-04
NIH Institute/Center: NIH

Principal Investigator: Rosemary Cadigan

Sign up free to get the apply link, save to pipeline, and set email alerts.

Sign up free →

Agency Plan

7-day free trial

Unlock procurement & grants

Upgrade to access active tenders from World Bank, UNDP, ADB and more — with email alerts and pipeline tracking.

$29.99 / month

  • 🔔Email alerts for new matching tenders
  • 🗂️Track tenders in your pipeline
  • 💰Filter by contract value
  • 📥Export results to CSV
  • 📌Save searches with one click
Start 7-day free trial →