grant

Adjusting for selection bias due to missing eligibility data in electronic health records-based observational studies

Organization HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTHLocation BOSTON, UNITED STATESPosted 1 Sept 2024Deadline 31 Aug 2026
NIHUS FederalResearch GrantFY202521+ years oldAddressAdoptionAdultAdult HumanAdult-Onset Diabetes MellitusAdverse ExperienceAdverse eventAmericanBMIBMI percentileBMI z-scoreBody Weight decreasedBody mass indexClinicalClinical TrialsCohort StudiesComparative Effectiveness ResearchComplexComputer softwareConcurrent StudiesConsumptionDataData BasesData SourcesDatabasesDevelopmentDiabetes MellitusEHR based researchEHR researchElectronic Health RecordEligibilityEligibility DeterminationEventExclusionFundingFutureGuidelinesHealthHealth CareHealth systemHyperglycemiaIndividualInfrastructureInvestigatorsKetosis-Resistant Diabetes MellitusKidney DiseasesKnowledgeLiteratureLongitudinal StudiesMaturity-Onset Diabetes MellitusMedical ResearchMethodologyMethodsMindModelingModernizationMorbid ObesityNIDDMNational Institutes of HealthNephropathyNon-Insulin Dependent DiabetesNon-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes MellitusNoninsulin Dependent DiabetesNoninsulin Dependent Diabetes MellitusObesityObservation researchObservation studyObservational StudyObservational researchOperative ProceduresOperative Surgical ProceduresOutcomePaperPatientsPersonsPopulationPopulation AnalysisPrevalenceProbabilityProceduresPropertyProtocol ScreeningPublic HealthQuetelet indexRandomizedRenal DiseaseResearchResearch DesignResearch PersonnelResearchersRisk FactorsSafetySelection BiasSevere obesitySiteSlow-Onset Diabetes MellitusSoftwareSourceSpecific qualifier valueSpecifiedStable Diabetes MellitusStatistical Data AnalysesStatistical Data AnalysisStatistical Data InterpretationStatistical MethodsStudy TypeSurgicalSurgical InterventionsSurgical ProcedureT2 DMT2DT2DMTimeType 2 Diabetes MellitusType 2 diabetesType II Diabetes MellitusType II diabetesUnited StatesUnited States National Institutes of HealthWeightWeight LossWeight ReductionWorkadiposityadult onset diabetesadulthoodbariatric surgerybody weight lossclinical databaseclinical practiceclinical significanceclinically significantcohortconventional therapyconventional treatmentcorpulencecostdata basedesigndesigningdevelop softwaredeveloping computer softwaredevelopmentaldiabeteselectronic health care recordelectronic health medical recordelectronic health plan recordelectronic health record based researchelectronic health registryelectronic medical health recordexperienceextreme obesityflexibilityflexiblegastric bandinggastric bypass surgeryhyperglycemicimplantable gastric stimulation bandinginterestketosis resistant diabeteskidney disorderlong-term studylongitudinal outcome studiesmachine learning based methodmachine learning methodmachine learning methodologiesmacrovascular complicationmacrovascular diseasematurity onset diabetesnovelobese patientsobesity surgerypatient populationpatients with obesitypre-docpre-doctoralrandomisationrandomizationrandomized, clinical trialsrandomly assignedrenal disorderrisk selectionsimulationskillssoftware developmentstatistic methodsstatistical analysisstomach staplingstudy designstudy populationsuccesssurgerytooltreatment planningtype 2 DMtype II DMtype two diabetesuser-friendlyweight loss interventionweight loss surgeryweight loss therapyweight loss treatmentweightswt-loss
Sign up free to applyApply link · pipeline · email alerts
— or —

Get email alerts for similar roles

Weekly digest · no password needed · unsubscribe any time

Full Description

Project Summary Abstract
The adoption of electronic health records (EHR) in healthcare has resulted in a hugely promising source of

data for public health and medical research. Because EHR include rich data on large populations at relatively

low cost, many researchers have turned to observational studies using EHR as an alternative to conducting

randomized studies that are often prohibitively expensive and time-consuming. However, EHR data are not

collected with research questions in mind, meaning data necessary for statistical analysis are frequently missing.

Two commonly utilized study designs in observational settings are the target trial emulation and matched

cohort designs. A critical component in each of these study designs is determining the population of patients

eligible for inclusion in the study. Missing data in variables that define eligibility criteria thus present a major

challenge for researchers. In practice, patients with incomplete eligibility data are frequently excluded from anal-

ysis, despite the possibility of selection bias, where subjects with observed eligibility data may be fundamentally

different than excluded subjects. Few works have acknowledged that missing eligibility data poses the risk of

selection bias. What little work exists doesn’t consider the problem in the above study designs, examine diverse

types of outcomes, or provide expansive guidelines on which clinical settings this bias arises.

An inverse probability weighting (IPW) framework to address selection bias will be developed in a manner

tailored towards sequential target trial emulations examining time-to-event endpoints. Estimation and inferential

procedures under this framework will be established, and methods will be evaluated on a complex simulation

infrastructure that adequately captures the intricacies of EHR data. This will enable detailed characterization of

clinical settings where bias arises in practice. IPW fails to produce consistent estimates when weight models

are missspecified. Influce-function based estimators will be derived, which will be robust to forms of model

mispecification and allow for estimation via flexible machine learning methods. This class of estimators will be

developed for the matched cohort design when interest lies in continuous or longitudinal outcomes.

The methods described in these aims will be applied to EHR-derived data that include long-term health

outcomes among 45,000 individuals who underwent bariatric surgery between 1997 and 2015, and over 1.6

million non-surgical patients eligible for bariatric surgery during that time frame. Specifically, this research will

answer open questions about the efficacy and safety of bariatric surgery in the treatment of patients with obesity

and type 2 diabetes, and will consider how rates of micro- and macrovascular complications associated with

diabetes differ between patients undergoing bariatric surgery and those not. Robust software will be developed

that provides researchers valid, practical, and user-friendly tools for the the identification, characterization, and

control of selection bias in EHR-based research.

Grant Number: 5F31DK141237-02
NIH Institute/Center: NIH

Principal Investigator: Luke Benz

Sign up free to get the apply link, save to pipeline, and set email alerts.

Sign up free →

Agency Plan

7-day free trial

Unlock procurement & grants

Upgrade to access active tenders from World Bank, UNDP, ADB and more — with email alerts and pipeline tracking.

$29.99 / month

  • 🔔Email alerts for new matching tenders
  • 🗂️Track tenders in your pipeline
  • 💰Filter by contract value
  • 📥Export results to CSV
  • 📌Save searches with one click
Start 7-day free trial →